For patients with chronic kidney disease, starting dialysis often requires a choice between different types of access to treatment. Two common options are arteriovenous (AV) fistula and Permacath catheter. Both have their advantages and disadvantages, and the best option may vary depending on the individual patient's needs and medical circumstances. This blog explores the differences between AV fistula and Permacath. Helping patients make informed decisions with their healthcare providers on vascular solutions at one place, we provide the best AV Fistula and Permacath treatment in Dadar, Mumbai.
AV fistula is considered the gold standard for long-term dialysis access. It is usually created surgically by connecting an artery to a vein in the arm. This connection allows the vein to become larger and stronger, making repeated needle insertions for dialysis treatments easier and more effective. AV fistula is known for its longevity and low complication rates compared to other types of access.
A Permacath is a type of central venous catheter specifically designed for long-term dialysis. It is usually injected into a large vein in the neck or chest. Unlike AV fistulas, PermaCath does not require maturation time and can be used immediately after placement, which may be important for patients who require immediate dialysis.
Choosing between AV fistula and Permacath depends on the health needs of the patient and the urgency of dialysis. AV fistula is generally the safest and most durable long-term option, while Permacath is useful when immediate access is needed. Dr. Sanket Patil, one of the top Nephrologists in Dadar, Mumbai, guides patients in selecting the most appropriate and safe dialysis access based on their condition and long-term kidney care goals.
Copyright © 2025 Dr. Sanket Patil Designed and Developed by Sharptech Media Synergy